The CX-90 Premium has a standard Secondary Collision Reduction System, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Pathfinder doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-90. But it costs extra on the Pathfinder.
Both the CX-90 and Pathfinder have Rear Cross Traffic Alert, but the CX-90 Premium Plus/Turbo S has Rear Cross Traffic Braking (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Pathfinder’s Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.
Both the CX-90 and the Pathfinder have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mazda CX-90 is safer than the Nissan Pathfinder:
|
CX-90 |
Pathfinder |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
116 |
150 |
Neck Stress |
318 lbs. |
348 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
255 |
312 |
Chest Compression |
.5 inches |
.6 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
42.3% |
45.1% |
Neck Stress |
96 lbs. |
216 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
83 lbs. |
93 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-90 is safer than the Nissan Pathfinder:
|
CX-90 |
Pathfinder |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
12 inches |
14 inches |
Spine Acceleration |
31 G’s |
37 G’s |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Mazda CX-90 is safer than the Pathfinder:
|
CX-90 |
Pathfinder |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Structure |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
104 |
125 |
Neck Tension |
45 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.28 in |
.63 in |
Shoulder Force |
134 lbs. |
156 lbs. |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Pelvis Force |
513 lbs. |
1160 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
18 |
65 |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.39 in |
.55 in |
Shoulder Force |
156 lbs. |
178 lbs. |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |